![]() ![]() "Hyper-V is more cost-effective for the size of our business One of the Hyper-V's biggest advantages over VMware is the cost.If you have an environment of less than 10 or 30 VMs, It's nice to have a Hyper-V, but if you have more than 100 or 200, I would recommend using VCenter, VMware virtualization, especially for an on-premise solution." "The licensing costs depend on the environment you have."I recommend Hyper-V to customers with budget constraints.".There are no monthly or yearly costs or additional costs." Therefore, I would like to see Oracle offer an extension pack or a licensed version that fixes this problem." "I find the solution to be incredibly unstable, constantly falling over and not working properly." "Oracle’s support team should improve its response time." As a result, I don't find it to be a good option. A lot of people contribute to it, and it's not authenticated by Oracle. We could use phpVirtual Box, but it is a third-party solution. Now, we use headless servers, install Oracle VMs, and manage them remotely. This is an area where Oracle is lagging behind. ![]() The reload of individual virtual machine definitions through the vboxweb service (via its API) without restarting it and the access to shared storage (to use teleport functions) need to be improved." "There are a few bugs that need to be updated." "The solution could be more user-friendly." "Having live migrations to move a running server to other hardware would be great." "The user interface needs to be improved." "Oracle VMs don't have a solid web interface of their own. "The solution lacks some open source remote administration tools. For the installation of Hyper-V, you're supposed to install the right operating system. It's easy to attack and compromise the host." "The only negative thing I heard was that the baseline price is very, very attractive relative to VMware, however, the vCenter counterpart, the thing that brings it all together, is quite pricey." "Hyper-V could improve by making it easier to manage." "In my opinion, it would have been better to truncate the site-to-site replication." "When it comes to Hyper-V the worst thing is it's based on the Windows operating system. Also, Hyper-V has security vulnerabilities. "Sometimes there's a bit of slowness in the VMs." "The management of Hyper-V could improve, there is a lot to improve in that area." "The solution should improve its native integration with other public cloud solutions." "The biggest problem with Hyper-V is that the virtual machines are mostly running on top of the Windows Server, so we often need to reboot the machine and virtual machines when updating the host level. Finally, Hyper-V is very easy to manage and offers great performance. ![]() Hyper-V makes it easy to move any virtual machine across push servers without complication. Additionally, users find the failover feature very important and, as Hyper-V is not a heavy solution, it does not overuse resources. Many of our users are deeply committed to the Microsoft ecosystem, so it is an excellent seamless fit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |